Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Skip to main content

‘Sully’ rises above this week’s newcomers


Tom Hanks (left) as Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Aaron Eckhart (right) as Jeff Skiles in Warner Bros. Pictures' and Village Roadshow Pictures' drama "Sully," a Warner Bros. Pictures release. (Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)
Tom Hanks (left) as Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Aaron Eckhart (right) as Jeff Skiles in Warner Bros. Pictures' and Village Roadshow Pictures' drama "Sully," a Warner Bros. Pictures release. (Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)
Facebook Share IconTwitter Share IconEmail Share Icon

Weekend Box Office Sept. 16 -18, 2016

SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV)- Neither “Blair Witch” nor “Bridget Jones’s Baby” came close to unseating “Sully,” as the Clint Eastwood and Tom Hanks film added an additional $22 million to its coffers. The biopic tells the story of the “Miracle on the Hudson” from the perspective of its hero, Capt. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger. The movie has now earned $70.5 million.

“Blair Witch” had to settle for $9.7 million, a far cry from the $29 million that 1999’s “The Blair Witch Project” brought in on its first wide-opening weekend. The silver lining here is that “Blair Witch” only cost $5 million to make. The bad news is that CinemaScore has audiences giving the film a D+. The movie will still turn a profit, but considering it was expected to open to $20 million this weekend, Lionsgate might be questioning its marketing campaign.

It’s been 12 years since we had a Bridget Jones film and it would seem that the once-popular franchise might have overestimated its shelf life as “Bridget Jones’s Baby” opened to $8.2 million. With a budget of $35 million, all eyes will be on its international numbers. I suspect that the U.K. won’t give the film a cold shoulder, but will it be enough to see Renée Zellweger return to the role for a fourth time?

Opening in fourth place is Oliver Stone’s “Snowden.” The film was always considered something of a wildcard. The movie is certainly better than Stone’s recent efforts, but Edward Snowden remains a fairly controversial figure. The film, which is purported to have cost $50 million, managed only $8 million. That’s actually higher than initial estimates suggested, but it does appear that someone is going to lose their shirt on this gamble, as I don’t see this movie getting any awards season buzz.

Fifth place goes to Sony’s thriller “Don’t Breathe” with $5.6 million. The surprise hit has now earned over $75 million against a $10 million budget.

Loading ...